Compare

ZK-SNAP Receipts vs Platform Logs

A dashboard log proves what the dashboard is willing to show. A ZK-SNAP receipt is designed to verify outside the system that produced it.

At a glance

Side-by-side

Educational comparison — not competitive marketing.

Aspect Platform logs ZK-SNAP receipt
Proof object
Platform logs

Operator-owned log lines inside one vendor system.

ZK-SNAP receipt

Signed receipt bytes binding action, claim, fingerprint, and profiles.

Portability
Platform logs

Travels with the account, retention policy, and vendor.

ZK-SNAP receipt

Travels with the file, export, or audit packet.

Verification
Platform logs

Usually requires the original dashboard or API.

ZK-SNAP receipt

Offline check from receipt bytes alone (Sigil S4).

Best for
Platform logs

Day-to-day operations inside one platform.

ZK-SNAP receipt

Disputes, audits, exports, and cross-platform proof.

What platform logs actually are

Logs live inside the operator’s infrastructure. They are useful for operations, but they travel with the account, the vendor, and the retention policy. When the platform closes or disputes the record, the log usually goes with it.

What ZK-SNAP adds

ZK-SNAP binds the machine action, claim commitment, fingerprint, signature, and declared profiles into one object. A verifier checks cryptography and declared profiles from the receipt bytes — not from the original dashboard.

When each is enough

Logs are fine for day-to-day operations inside one system. Receipts matter when proof must survive export, dispute, audit, or a different platform months later.

Related reading

Follow the thread on zk-ai.org.

Why platform-owned logs are not portable proof, and how ZK-SNAP receipts verify machine activity from bytes alone.